1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
- Environmental Health Watch
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) – Bruce Haber
- Greater Cleveland Asthma Coalition – Norman Robbins
- USDA Research Station, Gainesville – Rick Brenner, David Milne
- Johns Hopkins Allergy and Asthma Center – Ed Horowitz
|
4 |
- Safer and more effective elimination of cockroach infestation
- Assessment of cockroach allergen contamination
- More effective cleanup/ decontamination of cockroach allergen
|
5 |
- A potent, pervasive and persistent asthma trigger for low-income, inner-city populations
- National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study [1997]:
- 37% of children allergic,
- High levels in 50% of homes,
- Sensitivity + exposure associated with morbidity measures
|
6 |
- “exacerbation of asthma in sensitive individuals” (“sufficient evidence of a causal relationship”)
- “development of asthma” (“limited or suggestive evidence of an association”)
- [Committee on the Assessment of Asthma and Indoor Triggers of the Institute of Medicine, 2000]
|
7 |
- Multi-family complexes operated by the public housing authority in Cleveland.
- 18 housing units enrolled.
- Live roaches observed in 11 units and dead roaches in 16 units.
|
8 |
|
9 |
- Confirmation of roach infestation
- Elimination by IPM methods
- Pre-cleaning allergen measurement
- Cleaning interventions
- Post-cleaning allergen measurement
- Occupant education
- Follow-up allergen measurement
|
10 |
|
11 |
- USDA precision-targeted IPM
- Roaches flushed with a hot air gun and captured with a HEPA vacuum
- Gel baits and borate powders placed in harborages identified by the flushing
- Occupants educated to reduce food debris and clutter
|
12 |
|
13 |
- Elimination of infestation alone found not sufficient to reduce exposure below clinically relevant level in several studies.
- Recent study [Arbes 2004] found significantly lowered allergen from infestation reduction.
|
14 |
- Vacuum sample of settled dust
- 1 m2 area of floor vacuumed for two minutes, using canister vacuum with sample collection sleeve
- Vacuum samples from the kitchen, bedroom and one other room
- Sampled pre-cleaning, post-cleaning and follow-up
|
15 |
- Occupant or professional house cleaning not found effective.
- Allergens were missed or concentrated into hot spots
|
16 |
- Based on the HUD protocol for cleanup of lead dust on hard surfaces
- HEPA vacuuming
- Wet mopping and rinsing
- HEPA vacuuming
|
17 |
- Two modifications to the standard lead cleaning protocol were tested,
- wet vacuum rather than a mop to pick up dirty wash and rinse water
- substituting bleach/detergent cleaner for the detergent-only cleaner
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
- Better performance of standard lead cleaning may be due to the increased mechanical abrasion from additional mopping in this treatment as compared to the other two.
|
27 |
- No continuing input of allergenic material from roach infestation
- Reservoirs cleaned, e.g., rugs, upholstered furniture and bulk debris, which could have contributed to recontamination
- But some reservoirs were not treated, e.g., bedding, clothes, and wall voids
- Occupants continued cleaning
|
28 |
- Large amount of allergenic material
- removed prior to the first sampling for cockroach allergen:
- Pre-cleaning sampling done after the initial IPM work had been completed
- Flushing and HEPA vacuuming removed large numbers of cockroaches and a considerable amount of roach debris
|
29 |
- cockroach infestation reduction through precision-targeted IPM (including hot air flushing and HEPA vacuuming),
- a one-time professional cleaning based on the HUD lead dust cleaning protocol,
- occupant education and occupant on-going cleaning effort
- was able to reduce cockroach allergen to near proposed levels of sensitization
|
30 |
|