LEAD
____________
HOUSE
Asthma
Lead
Poisoning
Healthy
House
AFFORDABLE
GREEN HOUSING
Center
COMMUNITY
Air
Pollution
Chemical Safety
& Security
NATIONAL/
GLOBAL
Climate
Change
____________
Most
popular downloads
Recommended
books
Links
to other resources
Search
____________
About
EHW
Contact
Us |
|
Childhood Lead Poisoning brochures and booklets
- Cleveland and Cuyahoga County Lead Repair Grant Program - Free grants for lead repairs up to $10,000 - Call EHW at (216) 961-4646 for more information.
- Protect Your Family from Lead, U.S. E.P.A. (Booklet is required to be provided by landlords to all prospective tenants)
- Lead Hazards and Renovation (Renovate Right), U.S. E.P.A.
- Lead Facts for Greater Cleveland Health Care Providers, Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, and Shaker Heights Health Departments
- Lead Testing Requirements and Medical Management Recommendations Chart
- Lead Poisoning Prevention Guidelines for Cleveland and Cuyahoga County, Lead Safe Living Campaign
- Landlords and Lead: Protecting Children and Protecting Your Investment, Lead Safe Living Campaign
- Landlord Lead Hazard Disclosure Form - to be filled out by the landlord at the time a unit is offered for rent, signed by the prospective tenant, and retained by the landlord.
- Lead Poisoning Information for Teachers, Greater Cleveland Lead Advisory Council
- Cleveland Lead Ordinance, Health and Safety Information, Cleveland Department of Public Health
- Cleveland Lead Maintenance Certificate Program, Cleveland Department of Public Health
- What Every Family Needs to Know About Lead Poisoning (PDF), Northern Ohio Poison Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, and University Hospitals
- How Can I Keep Lead Out of My Child's Body? (PDF), Northern Ohio Poison Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, and Univeristy Hospitals
- Protect Children from Lead in Dust (PDF)
English- Black and White or Color; Spanish- Black and White or Color
Clear steps parents can take to protect children from exposure to lead in dust.
- Protect Children from Lead in Soil (PDF)
English- Black and White or Color; Spanish- Black and White or Color
Clear steps parents can take to protect children from exposure to lead in soil.

Data from Cleveland Department of Public Health and the Cuyahoga County Board of Health |
|
|
Lead
Poisoning in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County - Dramatic Declines, Continuing
Crisis
Too Many Kids Have Too Much Lead
And It’s Everybody’s Problem
- In Cleveland, East Cleveland, and Cuyahoga County, too many kids have too much lead and it is everybody’s problem. Of children tested in 2007, 16% in the entire County, 22% in Cleveland and 24% in East Cleveland had levels of lead that could diminish their life-chances.
- Lead poisoning is a tragedy for the child and their family. When rates are this high, it is tragedy for the entire community. It is everybody’s problem.
If you are worried about school performance, worry about lead. If you are worried about crime, worry about lead. If you are worried about workforce readiness, worry about lead.
more
- Most of the costs – for the children, for their families and for the community – cannot be calculated. But for some interventions and outcomes associated with childhood lead poisoning, we can make reasonable estimates of the dollar cost. We looked at the lifetime costs for the 6500 children tested in 2004 with elevated blood-lead levels. A new Economic Policy Institute study also researches the costs and benefits of lead hazard control, concluding there are significant returns to investing in early action controlling lead.
What
is "Lead Poisoning"
- The amount of lead in a child's blood is measured in
micrograms of lead per tenth of a liter of blood (mcg/dl). In
1990, the Centers for Disease Control established a lead level of 10
mcg/dl or greater as the "level-of-concern" (now commonly
considered "lead-poisoned"). The level of concern is the level
at which CDC recommends public health actions be initiated. At the time,
CDC did not define the threshold of 10 mcg/dl as "lead poisoning,"
acknowledging damage below 10 mcg/dl.
- As evidence of lead's damage
at lower levels continues to accumulate, there are increasing
calls for CDC to lower the level of concern threshhold. See Lead's
Damage Below Currently Accepted Levels, American
Public Health Association and A
Small Dose
Modified from A Small Dose
New
"Level of Awareness" for Cleveland/Cuyahoga County
- The
four public health departments in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland Department
of Public Health, Cuyahoga County Board of Health, Lakewood Department
of Human Services and the Shaker Heights Health Department), based on
research by the Medical Committee of the Greater Cleveland Lead Advisory
Council, recommends a child blood-lead level of 5mcg/dl be
used as a new level of awareness in the region, the level at
which response should be initiated. See Lead
Facts for Greater Cleveland Health Care Providers and Lead Testing Requirements and Medical Management Recommendations Chart.
- The
new level of awareness at 5 mcg/dl recognizes that many more children
than previously acknowledged are potentially hurt by lead - more than
22% of children tested in Cleveland in 2006 and more than 24% in the
East Cleveland.
Cleveland and Cuyahoga County Childhood Lead Poisoning Rates - 2008 (children under 6 years of age)
- Based on the CDC blood-lead level-of-concern
(10 mcg/dl), 6.3% (956 children) in Cleveland were identified
as lead-poisoned
- Based on the Cleveland/Cuyahoga
County blood-lead level-of-awareness (5 mcg/dl), 21.7% (3,298
children) in Cleveland were identified as lead-poisoned,
- Of the 25,351 children in Cuyahoga County that were tested in 2008, 16.2% (3,951 children) were tested at levels of 5 mcg/dl and above.
- Of the 25,351 children in Cuyahoga County that were tested in 2008, 4.8% (1,174 children) were tested at levels of 10 mcg/dl and above.
- Lead poisoning and increased blood lead levels have permanent affects on the well-being and health of a child, regardless of the current blood lead level.
- Prevalence history of Cleveland including charts and maps dating back to 1995.
Cuyahoga
County Childhood Lead Poisoning Rates - 2004-2008 (PDF of chart)
|
Cuyahoga County, Ohio |
|
Year Screened |
Total Children Screened (0-72 months) |
Number of Children with BLL 5 or greater µg/dl** |
Percent of Children with BLL 5 or greater µg/dl** |
Cleveland |
2008 |
15,168 |
3,298 |
22% |
Cleveland |
2007 |
14,987 |
3,322 |
22% |
Cleveland |
2006 |
13,809 |
3,532 |
26% |
Cleveland |
2005 |
15,048 |
4,319 |
29% |
Cleveland |
2004 |
15,477 |
6,517 |
42% |
Cleveland Heights |
2008 |
718 |
84 |
12% |
Cleveland Heights |
2007 |
926 |
109 |
12% |
Cleveland Heights |
2006 |
817 |
115 |
14% |
Cleveland Heights |
2005 |
757 |
112 |
15% |
Cleveland Heights |
2004 |
751 |
165 |
22% |
East Cleveland |
2008 |
529 |
170 |
32% |
East Cleveland |
2007 |
651 |
158 |
24% |
East Cleveland |
2006 |
683 |
216 |
32% |
East Cleveland |
2005 |
726 |
277 |
38% |
East Cleveland |
2004 |
790 |
359 |
45% |
Euclid |
2008 |
879 |
57 |
6% |
Euclid |
2007 |
892 |
48 |
5% |
Euclid |
2006 |
754 |
66 |
9% |
Euclid |
2005 |
706 |
70 |
10% |
Euclid |
2004 |
718 |
126 |
18% |
Lakewood |
2008 |
796 |
74 |
9% |
Lakewood |
2007 |
964 |
99 |
10% |
Lakewood |
2006 |
809 |
122 |
15% |
Lakewood |
2005 |
751 |
129 |
17% |
Lakewood |
2004 |
703 |
130 |
18% |
Cuyahoga County |
2008 |
24,351 |
3,951 |
16% |
Cuyahoga County |
2007 |
25,228 |
4,070 |
16% |
Cuyahoga County |
2006 |
22,323 |
4,432 |
20% |
Cuyahoga County |
2005 |
23,099 |
5,288 |
23% |
Cuyahoga County |
2004 |
23,157 |
7,999 |
35% |
Source: Data analyzed by Epidemiology and Surveillance Services at The Cuyahoga County Board of Health. Revised 4/14/2009 and 4/12/2010. Original data obtained through the Ohio Department of Health's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program.
* Data from the Ohio Department of Health and Cuyahoga County Board of Health, only cities with 500 or more children tested are included.
**5 µg/dl or greater is the level of awareness set by the health departments in Cuyahoga County in 2007 based on evidence that lead is potentially damaging to children at levels below 10 µg/dl. |
How
does Cleveland rank nationally? It
is always at or near the top.
- The chart below compares the cities with the largeste number of lead-poisoned children identified by testing (2003 data). Cleveland’s rate was the highest. Chicago had the most poisoned children.
- Cleveland’s high rate makes sense, since it also at the top for poverty. Lead poisoning is primarily a disease of poverty.
|
- The decrease in children's average blood-lead levels 1976-1999 is a major public health victory.
- How did this happen?
Not by cleaning up the lead, but by eliminating the sources of lead – in paint, in gasoline and other products.
- Now that the major sources are removed however, clean-up of exposure pathways – lead-contaminated dust and soil and failed lead-based paint - is needed.
This is much more costly and difficult because it must be done one house at a time.
So the rate of decline is sure to taper-off and likely to stall.
Strategy for childhood lead poisoning prevention
- First an intense focus on children, pregnant women, housing and neighborhoods at highest risk.
- Second an outreach and education effort to broadly integrate lead safety into all aspects of housing.
- The strategy is not dependent on stand-alone lead hazard control in a huge number of homes which would be an impossibly expensive undertaking.
- The goal is for lead safety awareness to become an ordinary part of everyday home repair, maintenance, renovation and cleaning.
- "Test the home, not the child, and eliminate all non-essential uses of lead. The key is to require screening of high-risk, older housing units to identify lead hazards before a child is poisoned - before occupancy and after renovation or abatement." Dr. Bruce Lanphear, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. See Preventing and Managing Lead Poisoning
Childhood lead exposure and uptake in teeth in the Cleveland area during the era of leaded gasoline
(Science of the Total Environment, 2010)
By Norman Robbins, Ahong-Fa Zhang, Jiayang Sun, Michael E. Ketterer, James A. Lalumandier, Richard A. Shulze
Environmental Research Journal Article
Longevity of the effectiveness of interim soil lead hazard control measures and influencing factors.
By C. Scott Clark, Paul A. Succop, William Menrath, Sandy M. Roda, Stuart Greenberg, Mia Buchwald-Gelles,
Hongying Peng (submitted June 2009). Full article available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/
Article Abstract:
A 7-year follow-up was conducted to determine factors associated with the longevity of interim soil lead hazard control measures that had been applied to housing in the Cleveland OH area. The approach involved (1) visual determination of the treatment integrity, (2) collection of information regarding 14 factors that may contribute to longevity of treatment integrity and (3) collection of one composite soil sample from treated areas with visual failure at each house and another composite sample from areas without visual failure. For the 200 houses studied, an average of 4 different soil areas were treated. For 96% of these areas, the treatments used were: (1) re-seeding, (2) mulch/wood chips and (3) gravel. Of a total of 191,034 ft2 of treated soil areas observed, less than one-third, i.e. 59,900 ft2 (31.3%) exhibited visual failure at the time of follow-up. Hazard control method and the presence/absence of shade were the only factors found to significantly affect visual failure rates. Of the three most commonly used control measures, the lowest visual failure rate was for re-seeding, 29.1% after a mean of 7.3 years; for non-shaded areas, which had been re-seeded, the failure rate was 22.2% compared to 35.7% for shaded areas. At 116 of the 193 houses (60%) that had both visually failed and visually non-failed treated soil areas, the geometric mean soil lead concentration was higher in the failed areas (p=0.003). The actual difference was only 13% with most levels equal to or exceeding 400 ppm. However, when compared to the US EPA limit for bare soil in other residential areas (1200 ppm) the percent equal to or exceeding the limit was much higher in the visually failed areas, 33.1%, than in areas where such failure was not observed, 22.0%.
Lead Data Analysis Report
Analysis of Lead Hazard Control Data, Disclosure, Risk Assessment and Clearance Data, Prevalence, and Multiple Poisoning Cases
Prepared by EHW
for the Cleveland Department of Public Health
- Risk Assessment
Large percentages of homes had lead hazards – 46% floor, 61% sill, 76% well, 49% soil.
- Clearance Testing
Based on clearance testing, 98% of housing units met standards by the final clearnace test
- Landlord Lead Hazard Disclosure to Tenants
83% of landlords did not disclose lead hazards information to tenants as required by law, based on tenant surveys.
|